Bainbridge on Corporations

Bainbridge on Corporations

Share this post

Bainbridge on Corporations
Bainbridge on Corporations
NCPPR v. United Airlines: Choice of Law and Books and Records Inspections
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

NCPPR v. United Airlines: Choice of Law and Books and Records Inspections

Why Illinois law would have applied to a books and records suit against a Delaware corporation

Stephen Bainbridge's avatar
Stephen Bainbridge
Jun 02, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Bainbridge on Corporations
Bainbridge on Corporations
NCPPR v. United Airlines: Choice of Law and Books and Records Inspections
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

In yesterday’s post, I discussed the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) lawsuit against United Airlines. NCPPR asked the U.S. District Court for Northern Illinois to compel United to produce for inspection a variety of internal corporate documents related to the airline’s decision to suspect flights between Newark and Tel Aviv.

United is a Delaware corporation, so one might have thought NCPPR would have brought suit under the pertinent provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL); namely, § 220. Instead, NCPPR sued under § 7.75 of the Illinois Business Corporation Act. In yesterday’s post, I took up the question of why they did do so. In this post, I’ll talk about why they could so.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Bainbridge on Corporations to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Stephen Bainbridge
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More