Bainbridge on Corporations

Bainbridge on Corporations

Why Does the DGCL Impose a 60-Day Cap on When Notice of a Shareholder Meeting May be Given

A question from class

Stephen Bainbridge's avatar
Stephen Bainbridge
Oct 22, 2026
∙ Paid

In Business Associations this week, while we discussing shareholder meetings, a student asked a question that stumped me:

Why does the notice requirement for meetings have a maximum amount of notice that can be provided (60 days)?1

I understand intuitively why there would be a minimum notice requirement, but a maximum notice requirement is unintuitive to me, as I imagine that more notice is better.

I don’t get stumped in class very often these days but it’s always sort of fun when it happens. (Getting tenure turned being stumped from a moment of panic into a learning opportunity.)

So I took a dive into Delaware Law.

Bainbridge on Corporations is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Bainbridge on Corporations to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Stephen Bainbridge · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture